<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>window office - Latest Comments in window office - Ad-hoc retrieval: measurably going nowhere «  IREvalEtAl</title><link>http://windowoffice.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://windowoffice.disqus.com/window_office_ad_hoc_retrieval_measurably_going_nowhere_irevaletal/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:41:18 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: window office - Ad-hoc retrieval: measurably going nowhere «  IREvalEtAl</title><link>http://windowoffice.tumblr.com/post/199101792#comment-17711298</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the pointer. Of course, we HCIR junkies have been saying this for a while, but we tend to see the problem as the emphasis on batch retreival measures, not whether researchers shop around for easier baselines.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:41:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>